Here is the e-mail that according to Jackie "does not exist" when asked for by City Attorney Mike Shannon for Janiece Miller's public record request that Janiece made to the city last April directly following her firing from Glazers.
From: jacquelyn.thompson@whitehall-oh.us
Subject: FW: Attacks on Elected Official
Sent; 04/13/2009 11:03 AM
To: rlepow@glazers.com
CC: jacquelyn.thompson@whitehall-oh.us
Dear Mr. Lepow-
The following e-mail was sent to me. other city officials and people outside of government using your company’s e-mail system. Does Glazer support this unfortunate and outrageous use of Its system to attack a duly elected City official? This is not the first emails that have been sent out by Janiece Miller under the auspices of Glazers Distributors of Ohio that attack me. Your hold harmless statement "All personal messages express solely the sender's views and not those of Glazer's Wholesale Drug Company, Inc." does not relieve your company from the harm that may have been caused to me nor does It enhance the reputation of your company, which has it's distributorship on Poth Road in Whitehall. Surely you have a system in place to weed out emails such as this. Does Glazers Distributors of Ohio support her attacks and opinion? One can only wonder. I will appreciate a response from your company and would hope that in the future your company would not be implicated in Ms. Miller's attacks upon my good character. From her email I think you can deduce that things are very volatile in our city right now and threats have been made. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
Jacquelyn K. Thompson
City Councihwoman-at-Large
360 S, Yearling Road
Whitehall, OH 43213
614-947-7353
jacquelyn.thompson@whitehall-oh.us
Jackie had also attached Janiece's e-mail(remember- it's posted on the blog already)...but cut it so it looked like it was sent JUST TO HER!!
What a piece of work YOU ARE JACKIE!!! I can smell the legal proceedings coming your way!!!
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Public Records Request
Well - Council Member Jackie Thompson has refused to hand over the public records requests that Attorney Mike Shannon informed her she was to surrender. The requests were made by the Columbus Dispatch, Janiece Miller and myself. Nothing to hide??? Ummm. You be the judge! Just more delay tactics from Jackie!!
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Well...yet MORE Jackie LIES!
So......I was going through the blog, council minutes, public records, the videos...you know - just checking the facts like any good journalist does. Any way....I saw in the minutes of Feb. 8, 2008 when I went to a Council Meeting for the first time since Jackie had been elected. I had gone previously many times, but none since she was sworn in. I made it perfectly clear that she has caused me enough trouble in the past with her harassment of citizens and them in turn calling my home to complain to her. I added that now that she was on Council, she needed to have the backbone to publish her phone number. I left directly after my statement. She said in the minutes of the meeting, that she had "NEVER" heard of me before and if I hadn't left, she would have gotten my address to send me a card. Right! Chris Rodriguez pointed out that all speakers have to give their name and address before speaking. Okay....so at last Tuesday's meeting, while she was slicing and dicing, she said that she first heard of me in 2001 when she was running against Chris Rodriguez and I wrote letters to the editor to tell people not to vote for her. Okay...let's "do the math"....2008 - 2001 is 7....count em SEVEN years that you LIED about JACKIE!! Oh...that's not it people...she told a resident while passing out her slew of "free" fliers (and I say "free" because she sure did not file financials for her "campaign" to stay seated, so they must have cost NOTHING at STAPLES...or for the postage for the 2200 she mailed out! And still no disclaimer on them!!)that "the MEN on Council have all voted to recall her". LIE LIE LIE Jackie...LIE! What the "vote" was- was as per the CHARTER rules, to set the date of the recall. That's it! No vote yet to boot her off council...THAT vote is November 3rd. Oh...and BTW, as you stay free from H1N1, remember to thank Jackie herself. According to "her", SHE is responsible for the Mayor following the CDC guidelines of alerting the public of any dangers. Ah come on Jackie!! Even YOU can't really expect that any citizen will fall for THAT line of CRAP! The CDC warned everyone last year that H1N1 would be back in full force this year....so don't even bother blowing your own horn on such rubbish Jackie!!!! So far Jackie, ALL that you've done for Whitehall is DAMAGE!!! Blood curdling, bone retching damage to any and all that have been in your way!!
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32!! Stop the carnage!!!
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32!! Stop the carnage!!!
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Mean Nasty Jackie!
As Jackie speaks for what she "believes" is her last poll council (God Willing!!), Jackie takes stabs, jabs, hacks, wacks, slices and dices through "the men" on council, the Mayor, Mr. Shannon and of course me! As I tried to contain myself, I found myself so darn amused at watching her head virtually spin off her neck as she spew hatred through out the room! Jackie in her own little mind, has decided that I am a robot of the city. It seems "the city" brings me out whenever she leaves her house. LMAO! Jackie said that THE FIRST TIME she EVER heard of me was when she ran against Chris Rodriguez in 2001. Seriously Jackie?? Really?? I purchased my home on Maplewood in 1985. You dirtied my neighborhood when you purchased your house in 1989. The point?? Oh Jackie Jackie Jackie. You started your crap with the neighbors shortly after you moved in. The blue tarps drove you insane. (I don't think you ever really recovered!) My daughter was 9 when you moved in so in the spring/summer of 1990 is when I got "the HATE letter". I called the Whitehall police. I gave the letter to the detective. The local paper ran a story titled "The Tale of Two Thompsons" at my request so people would stop calling me to bitch at you! You say you did not receive a call from the police...well...you hardly remember what it is the vote is about, so I doubt you remember if a detective called on you or not. Especially since you have such a "selective" memory! Then you complain about being filmed since April!! Oh Jackie!! You just never ever "got it". The entire point of the video was to get you to curb your behavior. Nope! Not Jackie Thompson! No no...you just HAD to act out a life time of evil, conniving, lie filled hatred at the expense of any citizen that dared to cross you. What was different with me? Well, I learned from years of dodging the citizens calls that you enraged, just how to stay a step ahead of you. Yep! That was me...ALWAYS RIGHT THERE! Make no mistake. I will be sure to keep you on the radar until the day I die to be sure that you never ever ever do to another what YOU DID TO JANIECE MILLER!!!
See Jackie in action as she spews more hatred and watch her laugh shamelessly as Wes finally has his say!!
NOW ADDED---As Teri Ranke sobs while reading her statement of opposition to Jackie's letter to the editor in last week's SNP---Jackie laughs, grins and smirks!!!
www.youtube.com/cjot1
See Jackie in action as she spews more hatred and watch her laugh shamelessly as Wes finally has his say!!
NOW ADDED---As Teri Ranke sobs while reading her statement of opposition to Jackie's letter to the editor in last week's SNP---Jackie laughs, grins and smirks!!!
www.youtube.com/cjot1
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
By Teri Ranke as read at Council Meeting 10/20/09
Ms. Thompson your letter to the editor of SNP this past week was undoubtedly one of the most self centered pieces of trash that you have yet come up with. You parade your patriotism as if it were a license for your outrageous behavior. You speak as if you are the only person who has ever seen the horrors of war.
I grew up next to a veteran who was bound to a wheel chair …shrapnel in his spine…European Theater. The father of a friend was pinned under a tank and it was either lay there and die or cut his own leg off and live…North Africa. My own father was on a destroyer that was torpedoed and it was thought all hands had been lost at sea…Pacific Theater. My father was the recipient of the highest honor that the Navy can give…The Navy Cross
I too lost friends in Vietnam and am married to a Navy veteran (USS Forestall) who served during Vietnam. I have two sons currently serving our country. Our Marine is in Iraq and our Army solder is due to be deployed any day. And I have had a tri-fold casket flag placed in my hands and have heard the words…”A Grateful Nation Thanks You”…as a 21 gun salute is being fired and TAPS is being played..The self serving statements in your letter are a slap in the face to all veterans and their service to our country and to their families. What the VFW did was to simply perform a basic business transaction. And even if they had chosen to make a political statement by renting that room…each and every one of their members past, present and future have more than earned that right!!! They are the ones who have fought for our democratic rights!!!
I grew up next to a veteran who was bound to a wheel chair …shrapnel in his spine…European Theater. The father of a friend was pinned under a tank and it was either lay there and die or cut his own leg off and live…North Africa. My own father was on a destroyer that was torpedoed and it was thought all hands had been lost at sea…Pacific Theater. My father was the recipient of the highest honor that the Navy can give…The Navy Cross
I too lost friends in Vietnam and am married to a Navy veteran (USS Forestall) who served during Vietnam. I have two sons currently serving our country. Our Marine is in Iraq and our Army solder is due to be deployed any day. And I have had a tri-fold casket flag placed in my hands and have heard the words…”A Grateful Nation Thanks You”…as a 21 gun salute is being fired and TAPS is being played..The self serving statements in your letter are a slap in the face to all veterans and their service to our country and to their families. What the VFW did was to simply perform a basic business transaction. And even if they had chosen to make a political statement by renting that room…each and every one of their members past, present and future have more than earned that right!!! They are the ones who have fought for our democratic rights!!!
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Dog Trial Day
There is honestly no end to Council Member Jackie Thompson and her rude and narcissistic behavior!! Today was "Dog Court Day" for Jackie. It turned into a pre-trial day...but what a show it was! She entered the courtroom with the spoken attitude of "I am a Whitehall Council Member"! She said this to the city prosecutor and to the judge several times. She waved papers in the air spewing that she has proof that she was innocent of breaking the ordinance on the day she got the letter. Please note - she did NOT say she was innocent ...she said she was innocent "on that day"! She was rude to the Whitehall Special Prosecutor, she disrupted the courtroom arguing with him as he attempted to get her to step out of the room to discuss the case. This "stepping out of the room" is protocol as we witnessed it for the entire time we were there. Someone would enter the room, call a name, that person would follow, they would return and be seen by the judge. No no...not Whitehall's embarrassment! NO! We have to be "represented" by someone who made a mockery of the courtroom while boistering "Iam a member of Whitehall City Council!!" (WooWoo..look at me!!) Someone who waved papers in the air at the judge even as he continually told her that it was not the day to give her "evidence". To top it ALL off-- the Special Prosecutor for Whitehall - Mr. Kevin Mantel said "The City of Whitehall is NOT paying me enough to take HER abuse!"
Dog Trial Part 2 -January 6, 2010-NO JURY!
Dog Trial Part 2 -January 6, 2010-NO JURY!
Friday, October 16, 2009
JACKIE THOMPSON DISRESPECTS ALL SOLDIERS' SACRIFICES
In her latest "attempt" to save herself from RECALL on November 3, Jackie Thompson has put a Letter to the Editor in the SNP this week. She has the AUDACITY AND NERVE to say that the VFW Post should only rent out their hall to groups SHE finds acceptable! Listen Jackie-soldiers have fought and died for ALL of OUR rights to FREEDOM of SPEECH....NOT JUST FOR YOU TO STAND IN THE MIDDLE OF TOWN HALL AND LIE LIE LIE to the good citizens of Whitehall!! SHAME ON YOU JACKIE THOMPSON! SHAME ON YOU!!!!
VFW should not take sides against supporter of soldiers
To the Editor:
A citizen called me and told me that the sponsors of the recall initiative against me were holding a fundraiser at the Whitehall VFW. This is troubling to me for several reasons.
First of all, it gives the impression that the VFW supports the recall. Secondly, this is very hurtful to me personally. My niece's father (and my friend), Craig Weber, was killed in Vietnam. My uncle. R.J. Claybaugh, flew bombers over Germany during WWII. My son and my brother were both submariners in the Navy.
My family has served and a member paid the ultimate price for his country. I have been to the Vietnam War Memorial and I have wept as I touched Craig's name and that of a school friend, Gary Leach. Craig's parents never stopped mourning and it shattered their lives. My niece was too young to remember her father and never had the opportunity to know him.
My whole adult life I have supported the soldiers and the veterans. I have written government officials letters in support of their issues. I have contributed to organizations that work to find and bring home those soldiers missing in action. I have stood with our soldiers and veterans always!
So I am disappointed in the VFW for giving credibility to my detractors and allowing this event to be held within the walls of an organization that is meant to represent and give comfort to all veterans and their families, not special interest groups with a political agenda.
Jacquelyn Thompson member, Whitehall City Council
The ballot reads as follows:
ISSUE 32
Shall Jacquelyn K. Thompson be allowed
to continue as Council At Large?
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
http://citizenjournalistcjt.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/cjot1
The Citizens For The Positive Future Of Whitehall
VFW should not take sides against supporter of soldiers
To the Editor:
A citizen called me and told me that the sponsors of the recall initiative against me were holding a fundraiser at the Whitehall VFW. This is troubling to me for several reasons.
First of all, it gives the impression that the VFW supports the recall. Secondly, this is very hurtful to me personally. My niece's father (and my friend), Craig Weber, was killed in Vietnam. My uncle. R.J. Claybaugh, flew bombers over Germany during WWII. My son and my brother were both submariners in the Navy.
My family has served and a member paid the ultimate price for his country. I have been to the Vietnam War Memorial and I have wept as I touched Craig's name and that of a school friend, Gary Leach. Craig's parents never stopped mourning and it shattered their lives. My niece was too young to remember her father and never had the opportunity to know him.
My whole adult life I have supported the soldiers and the veterans. I have written government officials letters in support of their issues. I have contributed to organizations that work to find and bring home those soldiers missing in action. I have stood with our soldiers and veterans always!
So I am disappointed in the VFW for giving credibility to my detractors and allowing this event to be held within the walls of an organization that is meant to represent and give comfort to all veterans and their families, not special interest groups with a political agenda.
Jacquelyn Thompson member, Whitehall City Council
The ballot reads as follows:
ISSUE 32
Shall Jacquelyn K. Thompson be allowed
to continue as Council At Large?
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
http://citizenjournalistcjt.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/cjot1
The Citizens For The Positive Future Of Whitehall
Monday, October 12, 2009
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Janiece Brings Proof!
At Council Meeting 10/06/09, Janiece Miller brought written proof that Council Member Thompson was IN FACT the one who had her fired. Of course, Council Member Thompson getting wind of the fact that Janiece was bringing her proof, chose not to attend the meeting. No surprise there. Watch the video WARD 4--How many tiles are in the ceiling?? and see Council Member LaCorte as she shuffles papers, looks up, down, all around ...everywhere but at Janiece. Now THAT's a Council Member who is really really interested in what the people have to say!!! Then...stay tuned to watch "Jackie's e-mails" and witness for yourselves as Council Member LaCorte snickers, sneers and shakes her head as I bring Council Member Thompson's e-mails she sent to the school Superintendent and Police Chief. YEP!. Jackie wanted Van Gregg stopped from running against LaCorte...and wanted the ENTIRE file from the murder/suicide of a Whitehall family. ENTIRE. PHOTOS. DOCUMENTS.
WHY?????????????????? SICK SICK SICK SICK SICK
(Please note when you view the videos, I blurred out the family name)
The ballot reads as follows:
ISSUE 32
Shall Jacquelyn K. Thompson be allowed
to continue as Council At Large?
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
http://www.youtube.com/cjot1
The Citizens For The Positive Future Of Whitehall
WHY?????????????????? SICK SICK SICK SICK SICK
(Please note when you view the videos, I blurred out the family name)
The ballot reads as follows:
ISSUE 32
Shall Jacquelyn K. Thompson be allowed
to continue as Council At Large?
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
http://www.youtube.com/cjot1
The Citizens For The Positive Future Of Whitehall
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Council Meeting October 6, 2009
Well well. After we alerted the press that Janiece was coming with WRITTEN proof that Council Member Thompson was WITHOUT doubt, ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY FACTUALLY the one who procured Janiece's firing, Council Member Thompson stayed home from the meeting. Um. I guess "the press" must have alerted her of the upcoming event and she just couldn't show her face in public. Not surprising. Who could face anyone who held THAT truth in their hand? Also, I brought the e-mails from Council Member Thompson to the school superintendent and to Chief Zitzke. She wrote to the school superintendent trying to get Van Gregg from running against Leslie LaCorte in the Ward 4 race for the council seat. YES! It's true. Council Member Thompson thinks so little of Leslie LaCorte's chances standing on her own, that she actually FACTUALLY - I HAVE THE E-MAIL tried to have Van Gregg pulled from the race by the superintendent. HOW? Well, the superintendent is his boss. Put it together any way you want to but it ALL ADDS UP THE SAME. Council Member Thompson tried to "NEGATIVELY AFFECT" Van Gregg's livelihood!! Ding Ding!! Where have we heard THAT before?? Ah yes! With Janiece Miller's experience AND from several other individuals. If Council Member Thompson doesn't like what you say or do.........SHE'LL GO AFTER YOUR JOB! FACT!
Also, I have e-mails from Council Member Thompson to the Chief of Police making a public records request for THE ENTIRE "murder/suicide" file! That's the very sad story of the murder/suicide of a Whitehall family earlier this year. THE ENTIRE FILE. Documents, photos, everything! FACT! Sick!!! Disgusting!!! How and Where did Council Member Thompson ever get her "God complex"? (God complex -A psychosis based in uncontrolled narcissism, inflated arrogance and a perceived need to subjugate and/or ridicule other individuals deemed to be inferior or unworthy.)
Also, I have e-mails from Council Member Thompson to the Chief of Police making a public records request for THE ENTIRE "murder/suicide" file! That's the very sad story of the murder/suicide of a Whitehall family earlier this year. THE ENTIRE FILE. Documents, photos, everything! FACT! Sick!!! Disgusting!!! How and Where did Council Member Thompson ever get her "God complex"? (God complex -A psychosis based in uncontrolled narcissism, inflated arrogance and a perceived need to subjugate and/or ridicule other individuals deemed to be inferior or unworthy.)
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Delicious Chili and Refreshments
Please join the Committee for the Positive Future of Whitehall Monday, October 5th, 2009 from 5:30pm to 7:30pm at the VFW Hall @ 4100 East Main St. Whitehall, Ohio 43213 Delicious Chili and Refreshments Suggested Contribution is $30 for single and $50 a couple We will always take any contributions in these difficult times. Come and enjoy the evening!
Friday, October 2, 2009
DISPATCH VOTER's GUIDE READERS
READ THIS for a FULL comprehensive statement as to why to VOTE NO ON ISSUE 32 !!!
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
Whitehall Council Member Thompson should be recalled from office:
- Willful and blatant violation of Whitehall City Charter, Section 8 . . . “The Council shall have legislative powers only and not perform administrative duties”. Councilperson Thompson consistently involves herself in administrative processes of the City.
- Commission of Acts wholly beyond Councilperson Thompson’s official duties:
Procured the firing of a constituent from her job because the constituent spoke out against Councilperson Thompson’s legislation.
Unsuccessfully attempted the procurement of at least 4 other persons jobs
Attempted to negatively influence the administration of a local business where a taxpayer was working because the taxpayer spoke out against Councilperson Thompson’s legislation.
- Harassment of City Employees.
- Consistently disrupts City Council meetings.
- Placing the City of Whitehall in precarious legal positions by willfully and blatantly disregarding opinions and advice from the City Attorney.
- Nonfeasance – Failure to perform required duty.
On 08/04/2009, Councilperson Thompson willfully chose not to fulfill her duties as member of Whitehall City Council. She arrived tardy to a meeting and chose to sit in the audience rather than working with other city council members as they performed their legislative duties.
- Promotes a decidedly unfriendly atmosphere to hamper creation and expansion of new business development within the City of Whitehall.
- Promotes a decidedly unfriendly atmosphere to hamper home purchases and sales in the City of Whitehall causing negative effects on property values
Contrary to the multitude of attempts made by Council Member Thompson to “change the message” of the RECALL, it is NOT about pit bulls. This is merely a political ploy, last ditch effort on Council Member Thompson’s part to try to hoodwink the good citizens of Whitehall into believing her lies.
FACT- there is NO mention of any pets on the RECALL petition
FACT-the laws of Whitehall are ignored by Council Member Thompson when they do not “suit her needs”. She has an upcoming TRIAL BY JURY in Franklin County on Tuesday October 20. WHY? Because though the Whitehall Ordinance 505.13 permits NO MORE THAN 3 dogs, Council Member Thompson had 5 dogs registered in 2008 and 4 in 2009. That’s 2 years alone that she has been in violation of the law.
FACT- Council Member Thompson wanted to change this ordinance to benefit herself by suggesting that someone with lap dogs be allowed by weight of dog to equal someone’s Great Dane!
See “How Many Chihuahuas = 1 Great Dane?” on www.youtube.com/cjot1
FACT- The “quote” used by Council Member Thompson regarding Dr. Mandi and HelpFido are in FACT an example of how Council Member Thompson twists words that she cuts and pastes to try to spin her way. This quote was in FACT from JULY 1, 2008 when Dr. Mandi was expressing the irony that Council Member Thompson wants to copy Bexley and Reynoldsburg in one moment but the moment before Council Member Thompson was saying that NO ONE BUT WHITEHALL RESIDENTS should have any say in what goes on in our city, and that everyone else is an “OUTSIDER”. Interesting how Council Member Thompson twisted THAT around.
FACT- Council Member Thompson tried to “negatively affect” Dr. Mandi’s livelihood by calling the animal clinic that employs her and stating that if they did not “do something” she would organize “her friends” to boycott the business.
FACT- Not only did Council Member Thompson OPPOSE the SCHOOL LEVY, she also wrote to the School Superintendent to “chastise” her for having a veterinarian speak at a school assembly to educate children on their pets…A YEAR AFTER THE ASSEMBLY!
FACT- Council Member Thompson attempted to overshadow President’s Day with “Darwin Day” and take away from the celebration of African American Heritage Month by naming it “Science Month”. When asked by Council if she knew what else was celebrated at that time, she said no.
--It’s this kind of negative behavior, continual circumvention of rules and law and the plethora of lies from Council Member Thompson that the good citizens of Whitehall are done with!
This IS about the dirty politics OF COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON.
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
PER THE WHITEHALL CHARTER- THE QUESTION MUST BE POSED AS
"Shall Jacquelyn K. Thompson be allowed to continue as Council At Large?"
VOTE NO ON ISSUE 32
The Committee For The Positive Future of Whitehall
view Council Member Thompson IN ACTION http://www.youtube.com/cjot1
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
Whitehall Council Member Thompson should be recalled from office:
- Willful and blatant violation of Whitehall City Charter, Section 8 . . . “The Council shall have legislative powers only and not perform administrative duties”. Councilperson Thompson consistently involves herself in administrative processes of the City.
- Commission of Acts wholly beyond Councilperson Thompson’s official duties:
Procured the firing of a constituent from her job because the constituent spoke out against Councilperson Thompson’s legislation.
Unsuccessfully attempted the procurement of at least 4 other persons jobs
Attempted to negatively influence the administration of a local business where a taxpayer was working because the taxpayer spoke out against Councilperson Thompson’s legislation.
- Harassment of City Employees.
- Consistently disrupts City Council meetings.
- Placing the City of Whitehall in precarious legal positions by willfully and blatantly disregarding opinions and advice from the City Attorney.
- Nonfeasance – Failure to perform required duty.
On 08/04/2009, Councilperson Thompson willfully chose not to fulfill her duties as member of Whitehall City Council. She arrived tardy to a meeting and chose to sit in the audience rather than working with other city council members as they performed their legislative duties.
- Promotes a decidedly unfriendly atmosphere to hamper creation and expansion of new business development within the City of Whitehall.
- Promotes a decidedly unfriendly atmosphere to hamper home purchases and sales in the City of Whitehall causing negative effects on property values
Contrary to the multitude of attempts made by Council Member Thompson to “change the message” of the RECALL, it is NOT about pit bulls. This is merely a political ploy, last ditch effort on Council Member Thompson’s part to try to hoodwink the good citizens of Whitehall into believing her lies.
FACT- there is NO mention of any pets on the RECALL petition
FACT-the laws of Whitehall are ignored by Council Member Thompson when they do not “suit her needs”. She has an upcoming TRIAL BY JURY in Franklin County on Tuesday October 20. WHY? Because though the Whitehall Ordinance 505.13 permits NO MORE THAN 3 dogs, Council Member Thompson had 5 dogs registered in 2008 and 4 in 2009. That’s 2 years alone that she has been in violation of the law.
FACT- Council Member Thompson wanted to change this ordinance to benefit herself by suggesting that someone with lap dogs be allowed by weight of dog to equal someone’s Great Dane!
See “How Many Chihuahuas = 1 Great Dane?” on www.youtube.com/cjot1
FACT- The “quote” used by Council Member Thompson regarding Dr. Mandi and HelpFido are in FACT an example of how Council Member Thompson twists words that she cuts and pastes to try to spin her way. This quote was in FACT from JULY 1, 2008 when Dr. Mandi was expressing the irony that Council Member Thompson wants to copy Bexley and Reynoldsburg in one moment but the moment before Council Member Thompson was saying that NO ONE BUT WHITEHALL RESIDENTS should have any say in what goes on in our city, and that everyone else is an “OUTSIDER”. Interesting how Council Member Thompson twisted THAT around.
FACT- Council Member Thompson tried to “negatively affect” Dr. Mandi’s livelihood by calling the animal clinic that employs her and stating that if they did not “do something” she would organize “her friends” to boycott the business.
FACT- Not only did Council Member Thompson OPPOSE the SCHOOL LEVY, she also wrote to the School Superintendent to “chastise” her for having a veterinarian speak at a school assembly to educate children on their pets…A YEAR AFTER THE ASSEMBLY!
FACT- Council Member Thompson attempted to overshadow President’s Day with “Darwin Day” and take away from the celebration of African American Heritage Month by naming it “Science Month”. When asked by Council if she knew what else was celebrated at that time, she said no.
--It’s this kind of negative behavior, continual circumvention of rules and law and the plethora of lies from Council Member Thompson that the good citizens of Whitehall are done with!
This IS about the dirty politics OF COUNCIL MEMBER THOMPSON.
VOTE NO on ISSUE 32
PER THE WHITEHALL CHARTER- THE QUESTION MUST BE POSED AS
"Shall Jacquelyn K. Thompson be allowed to continue as Council At Large?"
VOTE NO ON ISSUE 32
The Committee For The Positive Future of Whitehall
view Council Member Thompson IN ACTION http://www.youtube.com/cjot1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)