2008 has yet MORE DOGS & Committee Mtg May 26, 2009

MISSION STATEMENT as first posted on April 20, 2009
For the new readers, I am re-posting my MISSION STATEMENT which as you scroll down, you will see that it was my very first entry and the most important part of this blog.
-My Mission Statement is to alert all citizens of Whitehall, OH to the ridiculous and outrageous behavior of Council member Jackie Thompson at council meetings. Her behavior as an elected official is an embarrassment to our city. We as citizens need to voice our opinion and hold her to the high standards that she demands of all of the other elected officials.-

Now……on to 2008 dog license registration- in 2008
Jackie had 5 dogs registered in her name:

1) Sampson
2) Maxie
3) Tazzy
4) Brubaker
5) Mattie

At one point, she gave one of the dogs away to a city employee who renamed it….leaving her with 4 dogs….exhibiting that at any give time in 2008 and 2009, Jackie has been in violation of –

Ordinance 505.13 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS PERMITTED:
(a) No person shall keep or harbor more than three dogs, excluding puppies less than four months old, in any single family dwelling, or in any separate suite in a two-family dwelling or apartment dwelling, within this City. The terms "dwelling" and "suite", as used in this section, include the parcel of land upon which the building containing the dwelling or suite is located, and also all out-buildings located on that parcel of land. (b) Whoever violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.(Ord. 47-84. Passed 6-5-84.)

Question: Does Jackie have NO (zero, zip, nada, zilch) regard what so ever for a law if it is one that she finds inconvenient?

At Committee Meeting of May 26, 2009 – Jackie was back on her pit bull rant. She grilled Mr. Ogden and Mr. Shannon on whether or not the owners of the pit bulls are “in compliance with the law” of fencing, registration and leashing. SERIOUSLY??!! Also, a sore spot for Jackie is that the owners are allowed 3 (THREE, TRES, TROIS, DREI) pit bulls.
So….let me see if I get this right….Jackie... –are you okay with people having 4, 5 or possibly more dogs at any given time even if it violates -
Ordinance 505.13 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS PERMITTED
….as long as they are NOT a breed that falls into the dangerous or vicious breed category???? OR, is it just okay for YOU to be in violation???? SERIOUSLY?????!!!!!