Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Questions and Answers

Question: What are the names of the FOUR dogs registered to owner
JACQUELYN K THOMPSON for 2009 dog licenses?
Answer: #1) Mattie #2) Maxie #3) Christy #4) Brubaker

Question: What is the Ordinance that Jackie Thompson is in violation of?
Answer:
Ordinance 505.13 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS PERMITTED:

(a) No person shall keep or harbor more than three dogs, excluding puppies less than four months old, in any single family dwelling, or in any separate suite in a two-family dwelling or apartment dwelling, within this City. The terms "dwelling" and "suite", as used in this section, include the parcel of land upon which the building containing the dwelling or suite is located, and also all out-buildings located on that parcel of land.
(b) Whoever violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.
(Ord. 47-84. Passed 6-5-84.)

Question: Why is it okay for Jackie Thompson to break the law?
Answer: Jackie Thompson doesn't want to follow it.

Question: How many dogs would Jackie Thompson own now if she had not been forced to return her neighbor's dog to him?
Answer: FIVE


Jackie has been spending the last year and a half going after people and their dogs to be sure they're in compliance. WHY does Jackie think she is above the law???

7 comments:

  1. I have known about this for quite some time. I think I even mentioned it in one of my comments on your blog. I also know that an email was sent to council some time ago regarding this and nothing has been done. Obviously Ms. Jackie Thompson is above Whitehall laws and does not step up to the plate regarding her "higher standards" issue. Believe me if she knew who I were she would be causing me problems as we speak. A Pissed Whitehall Resident.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Speak to the City Attorney about the consequences of arbitrary enforcement

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jackie Thompson, we know you read this. Please explain to your constituents why you own or harbor more than 3 dogs on a continuous basis . . . without deception . . . if you are able to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  4. She is not going to "Explain" any of this. Come on, she won't explain why she got me fired from my job!!!! Jackie Thompson thinks she "Is the Law". It time for all concerned Whitehall resients to show her she IS NOT THE LAW!!!!-

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ms. Thompson - we are demanding an explanation! You love to remind people that 1000 people voted for you. Do tell those 1000 people your explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why are some of the comments deleted? Are we only allowed to say certain things on here?

    ReplyDelete
  7. No Lilly. When it says a comment was deleted by the author...it means the person who "wrote it". At times people re-think what they say and re-post later. On the other hand, if the posts are deleted by the administrator, ME, were removed, it was because they were hateful and had nothing to do with the Mission Statement.

    ReplyDelete